- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Föreläsning med Dr. Scott Connely, hur man bygger muskler och bränner fett. :emo-thumb
[http://www.rxmuscle.com/videos/lifestyle/5555-dr-scott-connelly-seminar-on-how-to-build-muscle-burn-fat-part-1-of-3.html http://www.rxmuscle.com/videos/lifestyle/5555-dr-scott-connelly-seminar-on-how-to-build-muscle-burn-fat-part-1-of-3.html%5D
Den första minuten hinner presentatören med att ge ”doktorn” (doktor i vad?) cred för att han var bland de första som ”upptäckte” hur fruktos ger hjärtsjukdom och cancer. Om meningen jag precis skrev är tongivande för resterande innehåll avstår jag nog.
Madball wrote:Den första minuten hinner presentatören med att ge ”doktorn” (doktor i vad?) cred för att han var bland de första som ”upptäckte” hur fruktos ger hjärtsjukdom och cancer. Om meningen jag precis skrev är tongivande för resterande innehåll avstår jag nog.Jag vet inte vad Dave Palumbo menade med cancer, men visst socker/fruktos är ju något att undvika då cancerceller älskar socker. Något som cancerforkare nyligen berättade om i Amerikanska tvprogrammet 60 minutes t. ex. Att socker/fruktos är en stor del i det metabola syndromet är väl ingen hemlighet direkt?
”Dr. Scott Connelly has devoted his life to the science of nutrition and fitness, and is considered around the world as a leading expert in the field of human nutrition and metabolism. A summa cum laude graduate in neuro-physiology from Boston Universtiy, Dr. Connelly has distinguished his career in anesthesiology, internal medicine, intensive care and cardiovascular medicine.
During his internship and residency at Harvard Medical School’s prestigous Massachusetts General Hospital, Dr. Connelly began working with critically ill intensive care patients. In order to help his patients maintain their health, he began researching and formulating products to help prevent the loss of muscle mass. What he learned about the effects of nutrients and exercise on human metabolism, body composition, disease prevention and immune system function, however, would soon have more far reaching impact. While continuing his research as a Senior Fellow in intensive care medicine at Stanford University, Dr. Connelly created a high quality protein formulation, which he trademarked Metamyosyn. This became the key ingredient in MET-Rx, the high protein low-fat vitamin and mineral enriched drink mix he went on to invent.
The MET-Rx formulation took Dr. Connelly over twenty years to develop, and is currently being issued as standard nutritional protocol in Harvard Medical Schools Brigham and Women’s Burn Care Trauma Unit and Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital. A study published in the Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation revealed that MET-Rx doubled the weight gain of severe burn patients over Ensure and Sustacal protein supplements. In turn, increased strength, mobility, and wound healing reduced hospital stays by as much as 30%.
First and foremost, Dr. Connelly is a physician whose goal is to improve the quality of life through superior nutrition for both the healthiest and sickest people. Dr. Connelly’s work is respected by health care providers, top athletes, Hollywood celebrities, and fitness enthusiasts worldwide. Expanding his involvement in public health, Dr. Connelly is the namesake of UCLA’s Connelly Laboratory for Applied Nutritional Sciences at the UCLA School of Medicine, Division of Clinical Nutrition. He is also a visiting professor at UCLA’s School of Medicine with teaching responsibilities in the area of the physiology of nutrition and muscle metabolism.”
Detta är vad jag förespråkar istället för att överdrivet BULKA och lägga på sig massa onödigt fett och kanske lite muskler, och sen leva som en slav och deffa ner allting..
Johan Otterström wrote:Jag vet inte vad Dave Palumbo menade med cancer, men visst socker/fruktos är ju något att undvika då cancerceller älskar socker. Något som cancerforkare nyligen berättade om i Amerikanska tvprogrammet 60 minutes t. ex. Att socker/fruktos är en stor del i det metabola syndromet är väl ingen hemlighet direkt?”Dr. Scott Connelly has devoted his life to the science of nutrition and fitness, and is considered around the world as a leading expert in the field of human nutrition and metabolism. A summa cum laude graduate in neuro-physiology from Boston Universtiy, Dr. Connelly has distinguished his career in anesthesiology, internal medicine, intensive care and cardiovascular medicine.
During his internship and residency at Harvard Medical School’s prestigous Massachusetts General Hospital, Dr. Connelly began working with critically ill intensive care patients. In order to help his patients maintain their health, he began researching and formulating products to help prevent the loss of muscle mass. What he learned about the effects of nutrients and exercise on human metabolism, body composition, disease prevention and immune system function, however, would soon have more far reaching impact. While continuing his research as a Senior Fellow in intensive care medicine at Stanford University, Dr. Connelly created a high quality protein formulation, which he trademarked Metamyosyn. This became the key ingredient in MET-Rx, the high protein low-fat vitamin and mineral enriched drink mix he went on to invent.
The MET-Rx formulation took Dr. Connelly over twenty years to develop, and is currently being issued as standard nutritional protocol in Harvard Medical Schools Brigham and Women’s Burn Care Trauma Unit and Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital. A study published in the Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation revealed that MET-Rx doubled the weight gain of severe burn patients over Ensure and Sustacal protein supplements. In turn, increased strength, mobility, and wound healing reduced hospital stays by as much as 30%.
First and foremost, Dr. Connelly is a physician whose goal is to improve the quality of life through superior nutrition for both the healthiest and sickest people. Dr. Connelly’s work is respected by health care providers, top athletes, Hollywood celebrities, and fitness enthusiasts worldwide. Expanding his involvement in public health, Dr. Connelly is the namesake of UCLA’s Connelly Laboratory for Applied Nutritional Sciences at the UCLA School of Medicine, Division of Clinical Nutrition. He is also a visiting professor at UCLA’s School of Medicine with teaching responsibilities in the area of the physiology of nutrition and muscle metabolism.”
60 minutes repotaget är bara massa skrämsel propaganda. Studien som programmet baseras på var ett gäng studenter som låstes in på ett sjukhus och fick gå ett tag helt utan socker sedan ökades intaget till 25% av det dagliga kaloribehovet. Problemet med hela studien var att INGEN av försökspersonerna motionerade eller styrketränade. Därför är det omöjligt att ha någon som helst verklighetsförankring.
Visst sitter du på soffan hela dagarna och matar i dig socker. Men de flesta på åtminstonde detta forum TRÄNAR. Därför är studien för de flesta irrelevant.
Dessutom 25% ?!?!?! Vem fan äter hälften av sina kolhydrater från socker? Jo de som inte bryr sig ett skit om va de stoppar i sig. Orealistiskt.
edamber wrote:60 minutes repotaget är bara massa skrämsel propaganda. Studien som programmet baseras på var ett gäng studenter som låstes in på ett sjukhus och fick gå ett tag helt utan socker sedan ökades intaget till 25% av det dagliga kaloribehovet. Problemet med hela studien var att INGEN av försökspersonerna motionerade eller styrketränade. Därför är det omöjligt att ha någon som helst verklighetsförankring.Visst sitter du på soffan hela dagarna och matar i dig socker. Men de flesta på åtminstonde detta forum TRÄNAR. Därför är studien för de flesta irrelevant.
Dessutom 25% ?!?!?! Vem fan äter hälften av sina kolhydrater från socker? Jo de som inte bryr sig ett skit om va de stoppar i sig. Orealistiskt.
Du får nog läsa på lite mer, krävs inga större mängder socker/fruktos för att lägga på sig kroppsfett i onödan. Att träna lite på gym kräver inga extrema mängder energi.
”For those of you that don’t know the “man behind the curtain”, Dr. Scott Connelly, the original inventor and founder of the Met-Rx, is one of the most knowledgeable experts in the field of protein metabolism. He was first to elucidate that protein is the driving macronutrient in the human organism. He was also the first to expose the dangers of high fructose corn syrup in the modern food supply in his best-selling book, BODY RX.
Connelly has taken all this experience and expertise and has created an entirely new supplement line knows as MYOTROPICS Physique Nutrition. Connelly is, as many would say, “The go-to guy in the nutrition industry.”
Rx Muscle’s very own Dave Palumbo considers Dr. Connelly to be his “personal mentor” when it comes to nutrition theory and problem solving. This should give you an idea as to how well-respected he is among those interested in creating physiques well above and beyond the status quo. Now that you know a little about the key note speaker, you’re probably wondering what the seminar was about?
Three points were driven home to an enthusiastic and eager crowd Saturday April 14th:
1. There is no simple relationship between calories and weight loss. IE: The 3500 calorie myth.
2. Protein intake is THE KEY to getting shredded.
3. Exercise is of course imperative, but what kind?
1. The first point was hard to swallow for many in the room. But again, that is why I call it a “Belief-Breaking” and “Forward-Thinking” seminar. Let’s face it, a large percentage of people in bodybuilding are personal trainers and have read, heard or taught for years that there is a definitive relationship between “calories-in versus calories-out” for weight loss.
For years I heard and even preached to clients that you must burn 3500 calories a week in excess of consumption to lose one pound of fat. Dr. Connelly calls that rhetoric, “bullshit.” Not to say that there isn’t a relationship of sorts; however, that relationship is highly dependent upon a number of factors. This balance is much more complicated than “calories in/calories out.”
To illustrate this point Dr. Connelly shows eight pages of equations that are attempts to arrive at the 3500 Calories = 1 pound of fat. Again, he claims this is false in humans and “Only true in bomb calorimeters.”
Rather than a simple mass-to-energy conversion he believes rather that it is influence by the ratios of the macronutrients we take in as well as multiple other micro chemical factors that take place in the body. All of these have a dramatic effect on our body’s metabolism.
At this point many were still skeptical so he broke out a colorful example to win the crowd over. “What happens when someone takes Prednisone?” The answer is pretty obvious to most in the room. In many cases the patient on the medication gains weight in the form of adipose tissue. As soon as everyone has digested that thought he asks, “How many calories do you suppose are in a Prednisone pill?” ESSENTIALLY NONE is the answer. The point here is that there are multiple chemical processes and backstops in the human body that transcend the IDEA of a direct relationship between CALORIC intake and weight gain/loss.
I’m not going to pretend to be able to give you a wrap up of this entire concept in a short paragraph, but I will leave you with the cliff note take-home message.
There is no evidence supporting the 3500 calorie burned equals one pound of fat loss in human beings. To learn more about this you have to listen to Dr. Connelly as he goes into specifics on these different biological processes.
2. Focusing on protein intake is the second point that Dr. Connelly nails home. In today’s world it seems everyone is obsessed with carbohydrates.
“Carb-free” or “carbing-up” are phrases you often hear. While many are focusing on carbohydrate manipulation, Dr. Connelly puts the majority of his efforts in the study of and consuming of protein. He explained that time and time again consumption of enough protein is THE KEY to getting lean. He presented slide after slide in the presentation supporting this idea. Sure, carbohydrates are a “convenient” source of energy for our body.
But, they are not the only source of energy. Ultimately our body will find a way to “create” the energy it needs if properly supplied with protein. How is this so? The basic idea is that our body can derive the necessary fuel to operate from Carbohydrates, Fats or Protein.
But, it is protein consumed in moderate excess that will actually lean us out. On the other hand, excess carbohydrates or fats will cause fat gain. Dr. Connelly, of course, used a multitude of massively more grandiose words to express this point. He called protein a “backstop” for energy production while losing fat and maintaining or even gaining lean muscle.
He bashes the USDA Food Pyramid in comedic jest. Dr. Connelly insists that, instead of the paltry 10-15% of your calories coming from protein, you should consume more like 35-40% of your daily caloric intake. After looking at the evidence, I can tell you this makes sense.
By taking in a large quantity of quality protein (and supplying the body with what it needs), you’ll and teach your body to stay lean. Interestingly, the human body knows how to handle an excess of calories derived from protein. An increase in metabolic rate is the eminent result of excess protein consumption; excess calories are burned off before fat gain occurs.
To illustrate his point, he used the example of “predation.” “Think about it…if you’re in the wild as an animal and you’re obese you can’t get away from a predator.” The idea here is that as animals we have “biochemical processes in place” to stay lean so long as we don’t jumble them up with extreme excesses of the wrong fuels or chemicals. What’s the take home message? Take in A LOT of protein and be satiated as you create the ultimate environment for fat loss.
3. The final point of the seminar was one that the vast majority of those in the room could relate to immediately. This was fortunate since the crowd began rolling in for the start of the evening finals by this point.
In essence, “You must exercise, and the best kind of exercise to lose fat long-term is resistance training.” We, of course, are aware of the basic cardiovascular benefits of traditional “cardio,” but for long-term fat loss, resistance training is king.
This is the one point that was relatively easy to capture in a few words. Basically, when you perform high-intensity weight training you prep your body to gain lean muscle. You teach your body to want to hold onto muscle and shed excess fat.
How does this happen? The weight training is a challenge to the system (your body) which requires adding muscle to handle the new stress. Your body is smart and adaptive to external stimuli so it adds muscle. Excess adipose tissue, on the other hand, is a hindrance to the challenge. So again, since your body is smart it sheds the excess fat. The result is a body lower in fat with more lean mass.
When all was said and done, all those in attendance (and those that watch the seminar on RxMuscle.com) were exposed to revolutionary information in the world of physique manipulation. Though low carbs and weight training were not earth-shattering ideas in dropping body fat, the explanation as to why they work was certainly eye-opening.
What is contrary to common belief is Dr. Connelly’s stance regarding 3500-calorie “rule.” I urge you to watch the seminar in total here on rxmuscle.com; and take notes! Your current physique ideas may be shaken but, ultimately, the body you’ll be able to create will be the one of your wildest dreams!”
Säkerligen bra för maximal muskeltillväxt och optimering av kroppskomposition. Tveksam till om det är speciellt hälsosamt i allmänhet.
maskin wrote:Säkerligen bra för maximal muskeltillväxt och optimering av kroppskomposition. Tveksam till om det är speciellt hälsosamt i allmänhet.Om du menar mängden protein så verkar det inte finnas något som visar på att det skulle vara skadligt för en i övrigt frisk person enligt dr. connelly.
Eskimåer etc lever ju, deras problem verkar väl var typ ”piting” i skelettet blir väl gropar om jag förstått rätt då de inte får i sig basiska saker som grönsaker. Så mycket grönsaker är ju bra att få i sig.
Johan Otterström wrote:”For those of you that don’t know the ”man behind the curtain”, Dr. Scott Connelly, the original inventor and founder of the Met-Rx, is one of the most knowledgeable experts in the field of protein metabolism. He was first to elucidate that protein is the driving macronutrient in the human organism. He was also the first to expose the dangers of high fructose corn syrup in the modern food supply in his best-selling book, BODY RX.Connelly has taken all this experience and expertise and has created an entirely new supplement line knows as MYOTROPICS Physique Nutrition. Connelly is, as many would say, ”The go-to guy in the nutrition industry.”
Rx Muscle’s very own Dave Palumbo considers Dr. Connelly to be his ”personal mentor” when it comes to nutrition theory and problem solving. This should give you an idea as to how well-respected he is among those interested in creating physiques well above and beyond the status quo. Now that you know a little about the key note speaker, you’re probably wondering what the seminar was about?
Three points were driven home to an enthusiastic and eager crowd Saturday April 14th:
1. There is no simple relationship between calories and weight loss. IE: The 3500 calorie myth.
2. Protein intake is THE KEY to getting shredded.
3. Exercise is of course imperative, but what kind?
1. The first point was hard to swallow for many in the room. But again, that is why I call it a ”Belief-Breaking” and ”Forward-Thinking” seminar. Let’s face it, a large percentage of people in bodybuilding are personal trainers and have read, heard or taught for years that there is a definitive relationship between ”calories-in versus calories-out” for weight loss.
For years I heard and even preached to clients that you must burn 3500 calories a week in excess of consumption to lose one pound of fat. Dr. Connelly calls that rhetoric, ”bullshit.” Not to say that there isn’t a relationship of sorts; however, that relationship is highly dependent upon a number of factors. This balance is much more complicated than ”calories in/calories out.”
To illustrate this point Dr. Connelly shows eight pages of equations that are attempts to arrive at the 3500 Calories = 1 pound of fat. Again, he claims this is false in humans and ”Only true in bomb calorimeters.”
Rather than a simple mass-to-energy conversion he believes rather that it is influence by the ratios of the macronutrients we take in as well as multiple other micro chemical factors that take place in the body. All of these have a dramatic effect on our body’s metabolism.
At this point many were still skeptical so he broke out a colorful example to win the crowd over. ”What happens when someone takes Prednisone?” The answer is pretty obvious to most in the room. In many cases the patient on the medication gains weight in the form of adipose tissue. As soon as everyone has digested that thought he asks, ”How many calories do you suppose are in a Prednisone pill?” ESSENTIALLY NONE is the answer. The point here is that there are multiple chemical processes and backstops in the human body that transcend the IDEA of a direct relationship between CALORIC intake and weight gain/loss.
I’m not going to pretend to be able to give you a wrap up of this entire concept in a short paragraph, but I will leave you with the cliff note take-home message.
There is no evidence supporting the 3500 calorie burned equals one pound of fat loss in human beings. To learn more about this you have to listen to Dr. Connelly as he goes into specifics on these different biological processes.
2. Focusing on protein intake is the second point that Dr. Connelly nails home. In today’s world it seems everyone is obsessed with carbohydrates.
”Carb-free” or ”carbing-up” are phrases you often hear. While many are focusing on carbohydrate manipulation, Dr. Connelly puts the majority of his efforts in the study of and consuming of protein. He explained that time and time again consumption of enough protein is THE KEY to getting lean. He presented slide after slide in the presentation supporting this idea. Sure, carbohydrates are a ”convenient” source of energy for our body.
But, they are not the only source of energy. Ultimately our body will find a way to ”create” the energy it needs if properly supplied with protein. How is this so? The basic idea is that our body can derive the necessary fuel to operate from Carbohydrates, Fats or Protein.
But, it is protein consumed in moderate excess that will actually lean us out. On the other hand, excess carbohydrates or fats will cause fat gain. Dr. Connelly, of course, used a multitude of massively more grandiose words to express this point. He called protein a ”backstop” for energy production while losing fat and maintaining or even gaining lean muscle.
He bashes the USDA Food Pyramid in comedic jest. Dr. Connelly insists that, instead of the paltry 10-15% of your calories coming from protein, you should consume more like 35-40% of your daily caloric intake. After looking at the evidence, I can tell you this makes sense.
By taking in a large quantity of quality protein (and supplying the body with what it needs), you’ll and teach your body to stay lean. Interestingly, the human body knows how to handle an excess of calories derived from protein. An increase in metabolic rate is the eminent result of excess protein consumption; excess calories are burned off before fat gain occurs.
To illustrate his point, he used the example of ”predation.” ”Think about it…if you’re in the wild as an animal and you’re obese you can’t get away from a predator.” The idea here is that as animals we have ”biochemical processes in place” to stay lean so long as we don’t jumble them up with extreme excesses of the wrong fuels or chemicals. What’s the take home message? Take in A LOT of protein and be satiated as you create the ultimate environment for fat loss.
3. The final point of the seminar was one that the vast majority of those in the room could relate to immediately. This was fortunate since the crowd began rolling in for the start of the evening finals by this point.
In essence, ”You must exercise, and the best kind of exercise to lose fat long-term is resistance training.” We, of course, are aware of the basic cardiovascular benefits of traditional ”cardio,” but for long-term fat loss, resistance training is king.
This is the one point that was relatively easy to capture in a few words. Basically, when you perform high-intensity weight training you prep your body to gain lean muscle. You teach your body to want to hold onto muscle and shed excess fat.
How does this happen? The weight training is a challenge to the system (your body) which requires adding muscle to handle the new stress. Your body is smart and adaptive to external stimuli so it adds muscle. Excess adipose tissue, on the other hand, is a hindrance to the challenge. So again, since your body is smart it sheds the excess fat. The result is a body lower in fat with more lean mass.
When all was said and done, all those in attendance (and those that watch the seminar on RxMuscle.com) were exposed to revolutionary information in the world of physique manipulation. Though low carbs and weight training were not earth-shattering ideas in dropping body fat, the explanation as to why they work was certainly eye-opening.
What is contrary to common belief is Dr. Connelly’s stance regarding 3500-calorie ”rule.” I urge you to watch the seminar in total here on rxmuscle.com; and take notes! Your current physique ideas may be shaken but, ultimately, the body you’ll be able to create will be the one of your wildest dreams!”
Så har jag kört på och det är ändå rätt trevligt att få det bevisat i ord att det är så det funkar.
Jag tycker mig se samma resonemang hos flera kunniga. Hela grejen med att man inte skulle kunna bygga muskler på -KCAL är ju befängt. Jag vet ju att jag själv lyckats öka i vikter under deff men då har jag ju också käkat mängder protein då man varit rädd att få i sig för lite och riskera muskelförlust.
Quote:Jag tycker mig se samma resonemang hos flera kunniga. Hela grejen med att man inte skulle kunna bygga muskler på -KCAL är ju befängt. Jag vet ju att jag själv lyckats öka i vikter under deff men då har jag ju också käkat mängder protein då man varit rädd att få i sig för lite och riskera muskelförlustDet är skillnad på nervanpassning/optimering mot ren muskeltillväxt. I realiteten är det efter honeymoon orealistiskt att tro att man kan öka muskelmassa utan ett överskott av kcal= Kolhydrater och protein i rätt proportioner. Studier kan lura ett ovant öga eftersom man se att muskelmassan ökar vid fettnedgång, men då handlar det i relation till LBM eftersom fettmassan minskar.
Det är säkert möjligt att öka muskelmassan med hjälp av preparat utifrån det här påståendet.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
